The scientific method, as you undoubtedly are aware, is essentially the same as creative problem solving (CPS), a well established approach to creativity. Indeed, some would argue that CPS is the basis of all creativity.

With simple problems, your method will work well. But with more sophisticated issues, I would advise a slight variation at step 3:

3.1 Generate and write down as many possible solutions to your problem as you can. Do not censor your ideas at this stage. Indeed, do not even worry if they are doable. Just write all of them down. You can even invite others to do the same, then combine your lists. Target at least 50 potential solutions.

3.2 See if some ideas can be combined into bigger, more comprehensive potential solutions.

3.3 Using one or more criteria, evaluate the ideas and identify those that seem most likely to solve the problem.

3.4 Starting with the most promising solution, try it out and observe the results.

3.5 If this does not work and the observations do not provide sufficient inspiration for a fix and retry, try the second best solution. Continue until problem is solved (or just keep going — maybe another solution will bring more interesting results). However, do apply to each new attempt what you have learned from previous failed attempts.

Jeffrey

I was leaving a comment on Problogger.net on a post about small victories and I came across your comment. I’m can’t lie, I’m a fan of what you have going here. I thought this was a great post breaking down the scientific method and using it to tackle anything that comes at you. I thought your linked resources were awesome too!! I just want to let you know that you have a new fan and keep up the good work. Now, back to me exploring about becoming a thoughtwrestler.