
Image by chillihead @ Flickr
I came across an anecdote recently about an anti-library. Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of The Black Swan, mentions this term in relation to the huge collection (30,000 + books) of Umberto Eco.
Can anyone really read 30,000 books in a lifetime? If you can read a book a day for more than 80 years, perhaps you can read 30,000 books. Most people can’t or won’t.
What’s more valuable, though: a collection of books that you’ve read (a library) or a collection of books that you haven’t read yet (an anti-library)? Bjorn gives a good summary of Taleb’s thoughts on the anti-library. An anti-library is supposed to be more valuable than a normal library because it contains knowledge that you haven’t learned and internalized in your brain.
This, of course, assumes that you’ve read everything in your own personal library, which is a goal that’s normally easier to read than a collection of tens of thousands of books. Most of us own less than two hundred books and many people own far less than that.
I sort of agree and disagree with the anti-library concept. Yes, there’s value in owning books with knowledge that you don’t already know: a dictionary is a perfect example.
On the other hand, an anti-library is a waste if you don’t actually use the knowledge that it contains. And, by using it, you eventually convert an anti-library into a library as you read its contents.
Taleb was using the anti-library as a metaphor to represent all of the unknown information in the world that can have an impact on our lives. When you think about it, all of the information available via the Internet and search engines has made a huge amount of information available to all of us. The Internet is almost the ultimate anti-library (second only to the world itself) and most of us will never learn even a minuscule fraction of what’s out there.
But until all of the world’s books are freely available in digital form, there’s still going to be value in having access to books made of paper.
And this brings me to a question for you, dear reader: how many books do you own? There’s at least 400 books in my home, divided almost equally between each member of the family. I’m sure that I’ve owned close to 500 books myself over the years, even though I don’t still have all of them.
And… how many books have you actually read? Is that number far greater than the number of books that you own (like at least two times larger?) I’m sure I’ve read at least 500 books in my lifetime, probably closer to 1000.
Next… how many books do you own that you’ve actually read, even if it’s only a chapter? I would estimate that I’ve read at least 95% of the books that I’ve owned. The lower that percentage is, the closer you are to owning an anti-library…
One last question for your consideration: how do these percentages compare to how you treat digital books (e.g. eBooks and .PDFs of all shapes and sizes)? I’ve probably read less than 25% of the eBooks that I “own”. I think that’s something important to consider if my experience is similar to yours.
I’m really curious to hear what you have to say!


Michael Gelb‘s 




