Category Archives: better ideas

Why and how you can get better at reading

Reading is more than letting characters pass across your eyes. It’s more than words and symbols flowing in and out of your brain.  Reading is more than just entertainment or time-killing.  It’s one of the main ways we learn, consider and grow.  Reading isn’t the same thing as doing, but it’s an important and valuable first step most of the time.

Many of us would benefit from learning how to read more effectively.  With that aim in mind, here are three different articles on the topic that I’d like to recommend to you.

How To Read (Brian Clark of Copyblogger)

Brian refers to How To Read A Book, which describes four different kinds of reading:  from the simplest skims to in-depth analysis, questioning and synthesis of information from books.  Brian urges bloggers and writers of all stripes to become better readers so they can do a better job of information their audiences.

Here’s a valuable quote from Brian’s post:

It’s been said that anyone can read five books on a topic and be an expert. That may be true, but how you read those five books will make all the difference. If you read those five books analytically, you will become an expert on what five authors have said. If you read five books syntopically, you will develop your own unique perspective and expertise in the field.

I don’t quite agree that reading is enough to make you an expert.  As Andy Hunt (via Merlin Mann) et al. talk about when they mention the Dreyfuss model, expertise and mastery require you to do a lot more than just read.  Nonetheless, Brian’s article does outline a very good process for reading and learning.

Master the True Art of Reading: How to Read A Book (Marelisa Faberge)

Marelisa uses How To Read A Book as source material but she takes a different approach by diving more deeply into the mechanics of reading.  She goes into the topic into a bit of detail but she makes it easy to understand and follow her directions.  It’s really well done.

Here’s some important insights:

When you read something–such as a magazine, a newspaper, a blog post, and so on–which is completely intelligible to you, your store of information might increase, but your understanding doesn’t. Your understanding was equal to these texts before you read them. Otherwise, you would have felt the puzzlement and perplexity that comes with reading something that is out of your depth.

When you read something that at first you don’t completely understand, then what you’re reading is initially higher than you are. The text contains insights which you lack. If you manage to acquire greater understanding after having read some text, you’ve elevated yourself through the activity of reading.

Do YOU challenge yourself enough with your reading?

Quite honestly, I’m glad I found both articles because they reinforce each other, despite being written by different authors.  I’m guessing that Marelisa read both the book and Brian’s article, which led to her own creation.  I think there’s a valuable lesson there:  take someone else’s starting point and expand upon it.  Worth remembering.

And then I found this post a few days later:

How To Read A Non-Fiction Book (Michael Hyatt)

Michael does not expressly describe the four levels of reading from How To Read A Book, but he alludes to both skimming and more detailed reading.  He describes ten tips for reading non-fiction books:  here a couple of Michael’s highlights:

Don’t feel that you need to finish. Not to be cynical, but most books aren’t worth finishing. I read until I lose interest. Then I move onto the next book. This is the secret to reading more.

and

Use a set of note-taking symbols. I use the same set of symbols I use when taking notes:

  • If an item is particularly important or insightful, I put a star next to it.
  • If an item requires further research or resolution, I put a question mark next to it.
  • If an item requires an action on my part or follow-up, I put a ballot box (open square) next to it. When the item is completed, I check it off.

Other thoughts:

One other interesting point about reading came from one of my favorite books, Advantage Play (which you really need to read).  The author describes magician Stewart James’s practice of reading magazines and newspapers (keep in mind that this reading mainly occurred prior to 1980).

James would use a sheet of paper as a bookmark as he read an article or a book.  He would make notes about important points on the bookmark, recording the location of the information (article, author, topic, page number, date, etc.).  Later on, he would use the bookmark’s information to update his own manual indexing system, which allowed him to track different pieces of information and bring them together again later when he needed them.

Can you imagine doing that manually in this day and age?  Today we’ll bookmark individual web pages and use some tags to find them again.  Or we might just be able to rely on Google to find it again without writing down a single ting.

These are all particularly refreshing thoughts about reading when it seems like we live in the era of the iPhone style scanning of content in milliseconds.

Do you have any tips about reading that have worked for you?

Note:  this post originally appeared at the now defunct Broadcasting Brain; I’ve updated and revised it.  Enjoy this while I’m travelling to SOBCon!

Big Picture vs Finish Line – Binary Learning Styles

Insect or Dry Leaf? - FlickrLearning, at its core, is processor-intensive for people.

While some people get really good at hiding the turning of their gears, others need to collaborate. Some of us can paint canvases of ideas and extrapolate from the tiniest bit of information, out toward a grand plan or strategy. Others of us find details within the grand plan no one else would consider worth focusing on, and pull at the thread until the problem unravels into its tiniest constituent parts.

This extrapolation or reduction process can be seen, in part, to be a function of lateralization of  brain function. Which camp most people fall into can be determined in part by their cognitive style – which side of their brain is dominant most often, and for which parts of their personal process.

Do I need to keep worrying about this?

Is what I’m working on finished? Was there an appropriate finish line to begin with? Do I know enough? Is this grade acceptable?

Left-brain-centric folks often take this track for learning. There’s process here – and it doesn’t mean ignorance of the importance of details. However, there’s also a lot of room for omission, where details are perceived to be unnecessary or do not immediately add a step down the path to completion. This can also lead to cognitive dissonance – a break in sequential  logic where details perceived to relate directly to one another refuse to get along with process.

Left-brain logic is often subtractive, reducing problems to their most granular

Do I have all the details I need?

What’s the big picture? Do I know all the important bits? How will this affect everyone involved? How do I know what an acceptable grade is?

This holistic, detail-oriented style of creative problem solving is often attributed to right-brain-centric thinkers. Broadly, it fits the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition better than reductive reasoning – but may not be applicable to other, more framework based learning styles. These thinkers tend to be concerned with filling in the entire puzzle before solving the problem – as, many of them will say, once you have all the information, many problems solve themselves.

Right brain logic is additive – like building a jigsaw out of information to create patterns and finding symbolic meaning in groupings, rather than in single instances of data.

Both styles of learning are discovery processes, and are two sides of an important coin.

And – because I’m a right-brain-centric thinker, I feel the need to add that this is a sliding scale, not a pair of poles. It also doesn’t directly tie into personality type – those falling into the intuitive category on the Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator may well be left-brain-centric, but express in a non-linear manner.

No matter your personal style or learning method, knowing and consciously playing toward your cognitive style can help you solve bigger problems faster.

Where do you fall on the extrapolative/reductive reasoning scale?

Photo by Yogendra Joshi.

 

Winter Wonder-land

img courtesy sxc

I wonder if this winter is ever going to end.

I wonder if my kids will still be making up snow days in July.

I wonder why my soon-to-be 7 year old daughter added “jetpack” to her birthday list.

I wonder when I’m going to find the time to work on my novel.

I wonder if the novel just got off to a bad start, or if I’m just a bad writer.

I wonder why traffic was backed up so badly on the bridge this morning.

I wonder if I am too old or even have the right kind of brain to learn analytics and get really good at it.

I wonder if anyone will want to listen to that podcast I want to do with my husband.

I wonder if I can convince said husband to do the podcast with me.

I wonder if the next time the elevator stops working at work, if I’ll be in it.

I wonder when I stopped singing (except for that BlogWorld thing.)

I wonder if Mark regrets asking me to post here, when I invariably forget till the last minute before my post is due.

I wonder how much it costs to fly to Aruba from Louisville.

I wonder if there’s any good material in all these wonderings for a story.

And I wonder if any of you like this post?

Want More Ideas? Produce More Content.

I suppose you might think the title of this post is a contradiction. How on Earth can you produce more content, if you don’t have any ideas in the first place?

You might be right.

But if there’s one thing I’ve learned about creating anything, it’s that the more you create, the more you create.

Look at some of the more prolific content creators out there. Guys like Gary Vaynerchuk and Chris Brogan are publishing multiple pieces of content multiple times a day. I’ve seen Chris post to his blog as much as 5 times in one day…and that’s in between hosting a live video show and giving a webinar. Gary publishes an entire webisode on WineLibrary TV 5 days a week (and as of this post, 963 episodes!). On top of that, he’s pushing video posts up to his personal blog, and popping up on Ustream for Q and A sessions. This doesn’t even count their multiple interactions on Facebook and Twitter. These guys are content-making machines. There are others like them. Leo Laporte and the TWiT network come to mind. Have you seen the sheer volume of content being produced out of that crew? Go to the iTunes store and type in TWiT. Scroll and scroll and scroll. Wow.

I know what you’re thinking. There’s no way to keep up with their level of content publishing. There’s simply not the hours in the day, let alone the ideas in your head to consistently push out that much stuff and still sleep, eat, work, and have a family life.

And I think that’s just a load of malarkey.

Gary, Leo and Chris are not magic. They are not superhuman. They have 24 hours in their day, just like us (Oh, and jobs, and lives, and families too). And yet, they still are able to bring new ideas to the table consistently. How? Here’s their secret.

They keep producing more content.

Yep. It’s that simple. You see, the funny thing about ideas is, they travel in packs. Think about it. When was the last time you just had ONE idea? Usually, creativity comes in waves. You’ll go through a phase where you’re pushing out 3-5 blog posts, or sketches, or songs a week. Then 3 months will go by with hardly a peep. The minute you stop creating, your creativity dries up.

It’s physics, really. Ideas in motion stay in motion. Ideas at rest stay at rest. So it stands to reason then, if you don’t stop, if you just keep on sitting down and writing, or composing, or painting, then you’ll keep having ideas for new things. However, if you stop for any length of time, it will be really, really hard to pick up momentum again.

So, here’s your homework. For one whole week, I want you to create something new every day. It might be a blog post, or a video. Maybe a song, or a poem. Whatever it is, you MUST create a new thing, every single day. Ideally, you’ll publish it too. And no excuses. Schedule it in your calendar, and if it means getting up a half hour earlier or going to bed a half hour later, so be it.

After one week, I challenge you to tell me that you don’t have more ideas swimming around in your head.

The secret to having more ideas is to put more of your ideas into action.

Off you go, then. Happy creating!

Photo credit: andrew kennedy on Flickr

How to Turn Inspiration into Action

Have you ever had a great idea? No, I mean, a really great idea. The kind that, when it hits you, you’re like, “Whoa. That’s a GREAT idea.”.

I think we have all had those moments of inspiration, where we get an idea that is so original, so exciting, so brilliant, that it keeps us up all night. But then, the reality of the next day sets in – kids, work, bills – and the idea fades. The momentum of the original inspiration is lost. So many fantastic ideas go by the wayside because what seemed like such an amazing inspiration is sucked up into feelings of self doubt, lack of time, or fear of commitment.

So how do we take our moments of insight and turn them into something real?

Grab a Buddy

I’ve known my business partner for 16 years. She is one of my best friends. We’ve been in business together for 7 of those years. The entire time I’ve known her, I bet you she has called me 1000 times or more and said this very line…”I have a GENIUS idea.” And although all 1000 of those ideas may have not come to fruition (yet), the ones that have – like starting our business, making a home renovation TV show, and many, many others – have paid off.

If you have a flash of brilliance, don’t keep it a secret. Find a friend or colleague that you trust. Tell them about the idea. Let them help you brainstorm it. Maybe even get them involved in executing it. Two heads are better than one, always. And having a friend in on it can often give you the kick in the pants you need to keep going. Not to mention, your friend can also let you know when your ideas suck, and probably help you improve on them too.

Don’t Fear the Outcome
A lot of people never execute on their ideas because of fear. Fear of failure, fear of success, fear of embarrassment, fear of reward – these are all the ridiculous fears we have about making our ideas into reality. Well, just stop it. It’s one thing to get super excited about a new, amazing idea you have. But when push comes to shove, and you have to actually put it into action – it’s often fear that stops you in your tracks. Having a great idea comes with the responsibility of making it happen – so don’t be afraid of how it might all turn out. Just barrel through and execute. Even if you don’t succeed, the rewards and lessons will be worth it.

Let It Evolve
How many of your initial brilliant ideas turned out EXACTLY as you’d originally planned? I’d bet not too many – and that’s fantastic! The only thing better than a great idea is a great, EVOLVED idea. The evolution of ideas – which comes with the chance to “sleep” on it, the inclusion of buddies, or just plain old thinking it through – is where the real magic of a great idea begins to take shape. You explore the idea from different angles, think of what can work, what might not work, and let the idea grow and shape and evolve into something even more exciting. Don’t get set in your ways with an idea – let it bloom naturally, and it will be more beautiful than you can imagine.

Timing is Everything
Many a great idea has been stopped in its tracks by bad timing. And, realizing that, even though your idea is terrific, it might not be the best time to execute it, is okay. I’ve got tons of ideas sitting in the incubator right now. Some have been there for a couple of years. It just hasn’t been the right time. The stars have not aligned, because they are busy aligning on other ideas right now. So don’t ever give up on a good idea – put it in the incubator. When the time is right, your great idea might just be more powerful than ever.

Ok – your turn. How do you turn inspiration into action?

[photo credit: Faith Goble on Flickr]

Group Thoughtwrestling for the Benefit of All

This past weekend I had the immense pleasure of attending Podcamp Montreal. It’s a wonderful event, full of smart people, all coming together for a weekend of sharing, insight, and learning, and yes, creativity.

One of the things I really like about Podcamp’s Un-Conference format is that a lot of the sessions are really discussion-oriented. The session presenter, or facilitator, will lead the discussion with a few slides to provide context, but then the floor is opened so the rest of the group can share their thoughts and ideas. This sometimes results in some pretty heated debates, especially when getting into some of the more philosophical areas around new media, marketing, and communication.

What I love most is the creative energy these sessions create. Take a room full of smart people, some current, interesting and sometimes controversial topics, and not only do you get some stimulating conversation, but you get some pretty darn good ideas out of it too. It dawned on me this past weekend that what we were doing in these sessions was a kind of “Group Thoughtwrestling”.

The thing is, this type of collaborative creativity only really works if people are ready and willing to dive in and get their hands a bit dirty. Here are a few ways you can take your next Group Thoughtwrestle to the next level:

Speak Up.
For this kind of format to work, it’s really important that everyone who wants to gets a chance to have their voice heard, including you. So don’t just sit on the sidelines and let all the loudest people in the room have the mic. Stick your hand up and join the conversation. Don’t be afraid to have an opinion. Don’t worry if someone disagrees with you. We’re all here to learn, and grow, and there is room enough for more than one opinion in the room. If you don’t speak up, your wisdom can’t be known. So get in there, say something. The more you do it, the easier (and more fun) it will get.

Take Notes.
If the session is being recorded (as all sessions at Podcamp Montreal were) then great. You have something to go back and refer to. But if that isn’t an option, then be sure to take good notes, so you have a way to take the ideas presented in the session to the next level. Share these notes with anyone in the group who wants them. And follow up on any ideas or actions that come out of what was said.

Break Away.
One of the cool things that happens at unconferences is that even though the sessions are only 45 minutes long, the conversations continue long afterwards, either over a meal, or drinks, or in small “breakout” sessions that can spontaneously occur. Leave room in your Group Thoughtwrestle for these situations to happen. Take extended breaks; instead of 15 minutes, break for 1 hour. Often, people will go away and think together a while longer, and come back to the table with some new creative approaches.

R-E-S-P-E-C-T
Above all, and like any good brainstorming or collaborative session, have respect for your co-participants. Disagreements will sometimes happen, and often, especially in a creatively charged environment, they can become quite heated. Remind everyone not to take things personally, and give each person in the session the time and ability to communicate their ideas in their own way. Ultimately, if you’re patient with each other, and the process, you’ll end up with some brilliant new ideas and approaches that can take your creative endeavours to the next level!

What do you think? Do you have experiences in a creatively-charged group? What were the results of your last Group Thoughtwrestling session?

[Photo credit: EvaBlue on Flickr]


Sign up for free Thoughtwrestling updates by E-Mail, RSS subscription or newsletter so you can read great ideas about creativitycreative thinkingproblem solving, and getting things done.

Editing is Not Censoring

img "shhhh!" courtesy bewinca on sxc

Let’s just say, right up front, I’m a big fan of editing.  I believe it’s an extraordinarily important, frequently undervalued part of the creative process.

That said, Jordan Cooper’s recent blog post on Eliminating Your Internal Broadcast Delay did a great job of reminding me why you don’t try to edit and write at the same time.

I think it’s important to note the differences between your inner Editor (who you should encourage when it’s time to edit), your inner Critic (who can be helpful when accessed appropriately), and your inner Censor (who is a useless pain in the arse).

For the sake of example, let’s just eavesdrop on the three for a moment, shall we?

Critic: Okay, that first sentence isn’t quite working.  It feels cumbersome when I try to read it out loud.

Editor: Yup.  We need to eliminate at least one adverb, and possibly break it into two separate sentences.

Censor: Geez, can’t you recognize a run-on sentence? What was the point of all that? Walk away from the keyboard, loser!

Okay, that’s kind of extreme.  How about these examples?

Critic:  That’s a really nice image there. I’d love to see you expand on that.

Editor:  This passage is a little fuzzy. Can you add a concrete illustration?

Censor:  Vague much? Seriously–nobody cares about this. Stop wasting everyone’s time.

Your Critic’s job is to review the overall impression of the piece, or at least major sections or elements.  The Critic is giving you a subjective, emotional reaction to point out what’s working (or what’s not.)

Your Editor’s job is to make the Critic’s feedback actionable.  The Editor takes the realization that a section or an element needs improvement, and turns it into concrete, specific suggestions for improvement.

Your Censor’s job is to protect you.  He (or she) is just going about it all wrong.

Unlike your Editor and your Critic, who provide rational (if sometimes subjective) feedback on your creative rough work, your Censor isn’t rational or constructive.

To borrow Jordan’s “corporate suit” metaphor, the Censor is all about risk management.  But to put a kinder slant on that part of you, your Censor is opposed on general principle to the emotional risks of your creative output.

The Censor’s job is to shut down and shut up your inner Creator.  Putting yourself out there for the world to see and respond to (or not) is an emotionally risky endeavor.  In many ways, it’s like an open invitation for intimacy presented to the general public.  Creative work is putting your heart on a platter and serving it up like an hors d’oeuvre.

It’s only natural that some part of you is deeply uncomfortable with that idea.

I’d like to dive deeper into all this–for instance, tackling ways to subdue the Censor.  But for now, I think it’s helpful to listen to the tone, purpose and content of your inner voice as you’re making a second (or third, or later) pass over your creative rough output.  Is it specific and actionable? Is it subjective and tonal, but constructive? Or is the point of your inner critique simply to convince you to commit the whole thing to File 13?

If it’s the last one, your best response is to ignore it.


Sign up for free Thoughtwrestling updates by E-Mail, RSS subscription or newsletter so you can read great ideas about creativitycreative thinkingproblem solving, and getting things done.

The Creative Value of Editing

editingHave any other Thoughtwrestlers been watching this season of HGTV’s DesignStar?

We are not going to discuss how the network has ruined a perfectly enjoyable show by handing it over to Mark Burnett.  We are also not going to discuss my dark horse pick for who I think is going to win.  Instead, we are going to discuss something that actually has relevance to the core Thoughtwrestling topics of creativitycreative thinkingproblem solving and getting things done:  the glorious value of editing.

In the last two episodes of DesignStar, editing was specifically called-out as a critical creative skill.  In trying to create a catalog cover photo for Sears, both teams were dinged for failing to adequately edit their designs.  There was too much clutter in both photos.   In contrast, during the next episode’s refurb dining room challenge, the judges pointed out that careful editing of the space was evident.

In other words, they noticed the visual clutter that wasn’t there.  Which brings me to my main point:

Clutter kills your creative intent.  Editing is the antidote to clutter.

You see a lot of cluttered writing in blogs.  I’m guilty of it myself.  In my haste to capture my thoughts and impressions, I often fail to make that second pass to edit the post, making sure my creative intent isn’t getting lost in verbal clutter.

Editing is not just proofreading.

Let’s be clear: the web could use a lot more of both.  Typos, misspellings and poor grammar detract from your creative intent, too.  They lower your level of credibility with the audience, and they don’t speak well of your respect for the craft of writing.

But editing is more than making sure your sentences are grammatically correct.  What I loved about seeing editing mentioned in DesignStar is that by translating the term to a visual creative pursuit, the true creative purpose of editing became clearer.

Editing is removing anything that doesn’t contribute to your creative intent and vision.

It also highlighted that editing isn’t confined to writing.  Whatever your creative medium, editing is a skill you need to cultivate.

Let’s take that point a little further.  Thoughtful editing is something you really should apply to your ultimate creative work: life.  This is an idea that’s explored explicitly in Don Miller’s A Million Miles in a Thousand Years: What I Learned by Editing My Life (affiliate link).   In the book, Miller talks about how having to translate his memoirs into a movie made him think more consciously about how he was living out the “sequel,” and how he began to find himself editing his choices in light of seeing his life as a cohesive, meaningful story.

This is more or less the thinking behind my own recent personal clutter purge (which is still going on, and which I’m still getting a ton of creative energy from doing).

Whether you’re editing the clutter from your physical environment,  your schedule or your latest short story; you’re creating something better by removing what’s not working.

I’d like to leave you with some thoughts from Stephen King on the value of editing:

If you haven’t marked up your manuscript a lot, you did a lazy job. Only God gets things right the first time. Don’t be a slob.”


Subscribe to Thoughtwrestling so you can read more great ideas about creative thinking, problem solving, and getting things done.

Image by TheCreativePenn and DC Comics.

Free Prize Inside!

Lately I am nostalgic for a time when products could have an element of fun. Here are a few that spring to mind:

Buried Treasures – an ice cream bar that tasted like sherbet. It had a plastic grip with a platform that the ice cream sat on, and as you licked away the ice cream, it revealed some kind of figure. Perhaps kids were meant to break off the “stick” end and use the figures as toys, I don’t remember.

Cracker Jack – this caramel popcorn and peanuts snack has been around for ages, and for past generations was synonymous with the concept of a “free prize inside”. When I was a kid, Cracker Jack came in boxes roughly the size of a paperback, and usually contained an actual small toy, like a novelty ring or top. As time passed, those toys were replaced with stickers or tattoos sealed in a flat protective package. Today, the “prize” is almost always those stickers as far as I can tell.

Cereal – breakfast cereals used to be synonymous with cheap plastic prizes too. I remember getting a plastic, life-sized  jack-knife from a box of cereal when I was about 5. My dad used it to saw through a rusty muffler pipe on a car trip. That sort of prize was not unusual back in the day. As the 80s wore on, cereal prizes evolved from general amusements to novelties associated with whatever movies were coming out at the time (like Happy Meal toys are now). As cereals strove to present themselves as healthy, the toys gave way to pedometers and DVDs and coupons. In their heyday, kids would beg for a particular cereal because of the toys promised within; it’s hard to imagine that now.

Bottle caps – in the 70s and 80s it was common to peel back the plastic liner of a bottle cap and find that you had won something, usually another bottle of pop. But I vividly remember the Coca-Cola contest associated with the release of Star Wars. All of the major characters from the film were printed on the liners of Coke bottle caps, and the glue was particularly strong so it was easy to damage them trying to peel them off; but if you collected the right combination, there was a large cash prize. Other combinations led to toys and of course, free Coke.

Why am I thinking about this? I guess I just miss something that used to be fun. They still have “free prizes” on pop bottles and cereal boxes and so on, of course; but these days it involves finding a PIN number, registering at a website, collecting points. Some fun, huh?

I understand the rationale. Plastic toys wind up in landfills. Plastic liners can be forged. PIN numbers and websites make for lower costs and better security. So the challenge, for consumers and creators alike, is: how do we create that sense of fun and anticipation in this modern world?

Kat’s Super-Secret Recipe for Creative Work

secret recipeLean in, kiddos.

I am about to impart to you the wisdom of the ages.

The super-secret, hush-hush, “I could tell you, but then I’d have to kill you” secret of how I do my best creative work.

Ready?

It’s called “starting.”

Seriously.  I’d love to tell you I have a particular setting, or time of day, or list of conditions that create the ideal incubator for amazing creative work.

But I don’t.  The recipe is.. there is no recipe.  This isn’t science.  It’s more like alchemy.  There are ingredients. Usually those ingredients have certain effects. When you put them all together and apply heat…”results may vary,” to borrow a phrase from our friends in the pharmaceutical trade.

Okay, I lured you in here with promises, didn’t I? I can’t just tease you with the wisdom of the ages and leave you with a fortune cookie, can I?  Of course I can’t.

Here are a few things from my Creative Grimoire that usually, typically, work well.  If the conditions are right.

  • Good paper, and a good quality gel pen. Like Tucker Foley, I am a technogeek.  But my best ideas and my best creative work, at least in the ideation phase, don’t usually originate in a digital format.
  • Bluegrass music. I know.  You aren’t from Kentucky.  You don’t refer to wrestling as rasslin’.  But I’m telling you–bluegrass music is awesome creative background noise.  The tempo is fast and energetic. The lyrics are usually so blurred by twang that they aren’t distracting.  I will admit–I don’t really like bluegrass all that much just to listen to it, but I’ve found that some of my best, most soulful and real creative work was produced under the influence of a banjo.  Make of that what you will.
  • Fresh air/outdoor activity. I don’t paint en plein air, although I’d like to try it.  I don’t pretend I can draft prose longhand while jogging.  And attempting a fiber art project while rock climbing or kayaking?  Probably not a great idea.  But when I am fresh out of sweet inspiration, and my head feels as empty as a peanut shell on the floor of Texas Roadhouse?  Movement and physical, particularly out in nature, gets the ideas stirring and bubbling again.
  • A nice glass of wine or cocktail. Yes, I know.  I have a history of working for wine and spirits companies.  And I know the whole stereotype of the tragic artist consumed by alcoholism (see: Hemingway).  And I’m not saying it’s a good idea to do it frequently. I’m just saying that in addition to the figurative sense that Mark illuminated beautifully in that linked post, literally having a cocktail, relaxing and quieting your inner critic on occasion has resulted in some pretty stellar (but still in need of editing!) work for me.

And while we’re on the subject, I should mention that I don’t think it’s a good idea to make any creative stimulus into a requirement.  Kayaking is certainly healthier than a manhattan, but I don’t think you should schedule a river run before every creative project, either.

That’s the danger of these kinds of lists. They do become a grimoire, a list of “magical” objects or conditions that you believe you need in order to unlock your creative potential.

Which can cripple you when you need to produce, and can’t get your recommended daily allowance of bluegrass because your coworker has threatened to brain you with a banjo if he hears any more Bill Monroe wafting from your office.

Ultimately, it comes back around to what I said in the beginning.  The key to doing great creative work is starting.  Getting past your perfectionism and your procrastination and all the other distractions and just … starting.

Because starting leads to output.  Output leads to better output.  Eventually, enough starting and finishing, output and effort, lead to great work.

See?  I told you.  Wisdom of the ages, here.

Image by myadlan


Subscribe to Thoughtwrestling so you can read more great ideas about creativity, problem solving, and getting things done.